Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of ERModelAIUsage

Timestamp:

09/02/26 21:05:06 (4 days ago)

Author:

236024

Comment:

--

ERModelAIUsage

@@ -13 +13 @@
 '''Diagram:'''
 
-[[Image(wiki:ERModel:ERModel_v10.png)]]
+[[Image(wiki:ERModel:ERModel_v11.png)]]
 
 '''Model description:'''
 
-The final result is ERModel_v10 for the BEST Skopje Hub information system. The model represents students, members and membership stages, organizational functions, activity sessions, event editions, event sessions, applications, core team functions, companies, attendance/RSVP for activity sessions, absence announcements, volunteering, mentorship, required attendance, and cooperation with companies.
+The final result is ERModel_v11 for the BEST Skopje Hub information system. The model represents students, members and membership stages, organizational functions, activity sessions, event editions, event sessions, applications, core team functions, companies, attendance/RSVP for activity sessions, absence announcements, volunteering, mentorship, required attendance, and cooperation with companies.
 
 My conversations with AI models, just like now, are usually for challenging my own way of thinking about the project and debating possible inconsistencies thoroughly.
@@ -161 +161 @@
 '''AI response 24:''' The AI suggested updating only the current model title, diagram reference, data requirements, and model history entry to match !ERModel_v10. The AI also suggested keeping old version information in the history table, because older names such as !CoreTeamFunctions and required_attendance are still valid there as historical changes.
 
+'''Prompt 25:'''
+Does it make sense for !EventFunctions to remain a weak entity?
+
+'''AI response 25:'''
+The AI suggested that !EventFunctions can remain weak because {{{ef_no}}} is meaningful only inside one event edition. It also suggested separating reusable function names into a separate !EventFunctionTypes entity.
+
+'''Prompt 26:'''
+How can expected attendance be represented so absence announcements are only possible when attendance is actually expected?
+
+'''AI response 26:'''
+The AI suggested adding {{{required_attendance}}} between Members and !ActivitySessions. This allows expected attendance to be stored explicitly and makes absence announcements depend on an existing required-attendance row.
+
+'''Prompt 27:'''
+Check whether !ERModel_v11 is consistent after the latest changes.
+
+'''AI response 27:'''
+The AI checked the updated model structure and confirmed that the model consistently includes numeric identifiers, !Locations, !EventFunctionTypes, {{{holds_event_function}}}, and {{{required_attendance}}}.
+
 == Conscious assumptions and creations done through the help of AI ==
 
@@ -166 +184 @@
 
  * Clarified that attendance and RSVP are modeled for !ActivitySessions, not for !EventEditions or !EventSessions.
- * Kept core team membership implied through accepted applications instead of adding a separate core team membership relationship.
- * Treated Main Organiser as a !CoreTeamFunction.
+ * Treated Main Organiser as an event function type.
  * Removed unnecessary application review data from the model scope.
  * Kept event/session eligibility as business logic instead of modeling it explicitly in the ER model.
@@ -183 +200 @@
  * !EventFunctions remains dependent on !EventEditions because function numbers are meaningful inside one event edition.
  * Empty relationship documentation lines were removed when they did not describe real keys or attributes.
+ * Kept !EventFunctions dependent on !EventEditions because {{{ef_no}}} is meaningful inside one event edition.
+ * Added {{{required_attendance}}} between Members and !ActivitySessions to represent expected attendance explicitly.
+ * Connected absence announcements to {{{required_attendance}}} so absences can only be announced for activity sessions where attendance is expected.
+ * Kept mandatory attendance rules as data that can be generated from the organization rules, rather than storing them only as informal business logic.
+ * Updated the final ER model documentation from the older versions to !ERModel_v11.